![davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fSi_d-bxbXY/UfkpMzpFnQI/AAAAAAAABMs/cHIyf6WANAI/s1600/Save+lut.jpg)
- #Davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots how to
- #Davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots pro
- #Davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots iso
One of the issues you may have is gamut clipping issues which will look like noise around certain colors like reds and blues. Every piece of raw footage from a raw codec I have received requires some kind of NR and usually prores files from very good cameras require it as well. You will generally need some kind of NR because this is raw footage.
![davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots](http://www.4kshooters.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Generate_3D_LUT_01.jpg)
a 2/10 in spatial NR with fast setting should do it. HD should not require much noise reduction if at all. If anyone else has any more advice, please feel free to post!Įxpect to use noise reduction unless you are super sampling to HD. Will definitely try out the ACES workflow, thanks for the suggestion! Essentially I need to expose a stop above like you've stated, but then doesn't this defeat the purpose of having 13 stops of dynamic range. Yet even this yields noisy shadows with CST. I do try an expose with the intention that I won't lift the shadows in post but rather expose them for how I want them to look from the get go. Thanks! Will definitely check out the ACES workflow. If you open the links in new tabs, you can switch between the three of them to identify the changes. I am really stumped as to what is the best way to get the accurate log to rec709 conversion that has minimal noise. (some further research into his correction process reveals that he corrects the log image directly by applying 1.2 contrast and 70 saturation in resolve!) The user claims that exposing how you want the final shot to be and not lifting any shadows results in a noise free image.
#Davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots how to
I recently came across this video by Areia Creations which gave a thorough explanation on how to expose the the camera.
#Davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots iso
I am fully aware of how to expose the BMPCC 4K and am shooting at iso 400. (a screenshot is attached below, check top left of image for chroma noise)
#Davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots pro
I'm working on a MacBook Pro 13" 2019 so the screen shouldn't have such a drastic gamma shift to make the noise more noticeable. I do not lift the shadows or midtowns at all. I am very familiar that RAW usually has noise in the shadows, but using the CST tool makes the noise very saturated and distracting. I was convinced for months that this was the right way, but I noticed that whenever I used this method, the shadows would be filled with red/green colour noise. The colours appeared to be more accurate to my eyes.
![davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots davinci resolve luts for underexposed shots](http://45jo5o2sxknq2fucgi3kwxpa.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Skintones-In-Davinci-Resolve.jpg)
I then came across the Colour Space Transform method that seemed so much better than the out method. I took a similar approach with the 4K version, using the extended video lut v4 provided in Resolve 16. I originally started out using the rec709 lut back in the original BMPCC days of 2012. I completely understand that there is a lot of misinformation online about how many you tubers go about colour correcting their footage. I have used many methods and cannot decide which one is ideal. I have been racking my brain for almost a year since getting my BMPCC 4K because I am confused as to which method is the best for correcting BRAW in Resolve.